Re: pure basic - classes idea!
Just because something works does in no way mean that its safe or correct. If I reprogram a car and end up disabling various safety features but it still drives, I can just say "well, it still works". Does that mean that what I've done is right or safe?
Emulating features that a language doesn't have is always a bad idea. It forces you to write code that you yourself barely understand for one. It teaches you to write bad and unmaintainable code for another. It, finally, makes it impossible for others to understand your code or help you with it. If you want a good example of why emulating things a language doesn't have is bad, look at what MS does in C with their __try and __catch shit, or even how people abuse setjmp and longjmp in C and end up creating endless mountains of bugs as a result.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
