ezkcdude;130930 Wrote: 
> Of course, that would be stupid, because it wastes memory. However,
> there are sound reasons to do this on the fly. Namely, upsampling
> shifts aliasing artifacts (so-called ghost images) to a much higher
> (inaudible) frequency range. As you alluded, upsampling does not add a
> single bit of new data, but it can allow a designer to modify post-DAC
> filtering (hopefully, for the better).
As the terms are typically used, it's OVERSAMPLING rather than
UPSAMPLING that shifts aliasing higher up the frequency range and makes
life easier for the filters. Pretty much every DAC on the planet does
oversampling these days (with the exception of the niche NOS ones,
which some might consider to be out on the fringe). It's mathematically
sound.

In contrast, upsampling (as the term is generally used) involves
INVENTING additional data (usually by interpolation) in the expectation
that it will deliver improved high frequency resolution. But this extra
data that's invented can't ever be known to be correct. Quite a lot of
the time, it'll be wrong. It doesn't "recreate" the high frequencies
that were discarded when the recording was sampled at whatever lower
frequency was used - that's impossible (as Sean pointed out earlier).
In other words, the additional high frequencies generated are NOISE
and/or DISTORTION. So how come people think upsampled digital audio
sounds better? Maybe for the same reason that they think that analogue
sounds better: that noise/distortion might actually be euphonic (if
it's audible at all).


-- 
cliveb

Performers -> dozens of mixers and effects -> clipped/hypercompressed
mastering -> you think a few extra ps of jitter matters?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26685

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to