totoro;169667 Wrote: > Perhaps. I read it differently. To me "no risk" means "no risk of losing > money". I would bet that this is a more common reading than yours. > > Of course, this is one of the things that makes linguistics hard: not > everyone reads a statement the same way. I still contend that it was > intentionally misleading.
What other risk could there be? The manufacturer coming home to beat you up if you try to return the product? ;-D No, I think it is pretty clear that "risk" always means financial loss when used about transactions like these. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31562 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles