totoro;169667 Wrote: 
> Perhaps. I read it differently. To me "no risk" means "no risk of losing
> money". I would bet that this is a more common reading than yours. 
> 
> Of course, this is one of the things that makes linguistics hard: not
> everyone reads a statement the same way. I still contend that it was
> intentionally misleading.

What other risk could there be?
The manufacturer coming home to beat you up if you try to return the
product? ;-D

No, I think it is pretty clear that "risk" always means financial loss
when used about transactions like these.


-- 
P Floding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31562

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to