Eric Carroll;180440 Wrote: > > > For example (to make this tangible not to be critical), the claim that > putting vibration isolators under an SB3 improves the sound. We can't > test it; there is no direct measurement. We can't prove out the claim > perceptually, you state its impractical to test. Side B views this also > as proof by assertion. But for side B, the issue is this violates known > rules of engineering and physics - there is no known process by which > large scale vibration could influence electronic processing (analog or > digital).
Let me just correct you on two points there: 1. No-one, as far as I know, has clamed "proof" of any influence by vibration modifiers under the SB3. 2. Of course this can be measured, with care and effort and the right equipment. 3. Side B often asserts what is "possible" when in fact they are merely stating what is the current set of accepted "truths". (And often limited to a rather small subset of "common knowledge" at that.) -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
