seanadams;199810 Wrote: > I don't follow how you came to that conclusion. It is an incredibly good > DAC and you would be hard pressed to find anything with better SNR, > lower distortion, etc. However, Transporter makes no apologies for not > resampling, so if you have your heart set on ASRC, get something else. > What I find strange here is that you are very concerned about jitter, > yet you don't want the ultimate best solution (word clock), which is > what Transporter offers. Do you really prefer to resample your signal > and settle for a (IMHO) lesser DAC, just to shave a few ps? It makes no > sense! If I were you I would audition both.
Sean, I appreciate having word clock link, I agree with you this is the ultimate solution, and I have no bias towards ASRC - I'm just saying that too much of gear has no word clock input to take advantage of that. And since word clock is the only option offered to end-user, I find myself in a problem when I have to use a source without that capability. What are you suggesting? That everybody go and buy all new sources? -- 325xi ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34980 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles