seanadams;199810 Wrote: 
> I don't follow how you came to that conclusion. It is an incredibly good
> DAC and you would be hard pressed to find anything with better SNR,
> lower distortion, etc. However, Transporter makes no apologies for not
> resampling, so if you have your heart set on ASRC, get something else.
> What I find strange here is that you are very concerned about jitter,
> yet you don't want the ultimate best solution (word clock), which is
> what Transporter offers. Do you really prefer to resample your signal
> and settle for a (IMHO) lesser DAC, just to shave a few ps? It makes no
> sense! If I were you I would audition both.

Sean, I appreciate having word clock link, I agree with you this is the
ultimate solution, and I have no bias towards ASRC - I'm just saying
that too much of gear has no word clock input to take advantage of
that. And since word clock is the only option offered to end-user, I
find myself in a problem when I have to use a source without that
capability. What are you suggesting? That everybody go and buy all new
sources?


-- 
325xi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34980

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to