Call it speculation, call it hypothesis. Whatever one calls such an exercise, it is not the nomenclature that predicts its value. If speculation (or hypothesis) is inadequately grounded in known fact, inadequately observed or poorly thought through, then, yes, it will be worthless; but if not, then not.
Your thought about rights to abandoned products is one of several known facts that I also had in mind. One other known fact is that the TP was one particular man's particular baby, if I recall correctly. As you suggest, none of us yet knows whether that fact in particular is sufficiently significant to kick the Ferraris (or yet Maseratis) onto the drive, or even to prompt the construction of a new garage (or, at least, those who do are not saying). But it will be interesting to see...... On 12 Nov 2009, at 17:20, Pat Farrell wrote: > iPhone wrote: >> cunobeli...@mac.com;484490 Wrote: >>> Hmm. Wasn't there some chap who started a Tiny Garage Audiophile company >> >> There was probably a signed "No Compete Agreement" > > Most likely. But companies do allow 'insiders" to buy out the rights to > abandoned products. > > This is all just random speculation, not clear that anyone with a Tiny > Garage has any interest in this stuff. > > -- > Pat Farrell > http://www.pfarrell.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > audiophiles mailing list > audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com > http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
