andyg;528143 Wrote: > Of course it's not abandoned. But even if it were possible to support > 24/192 I'm not sure there's a real reason to do so. Can anyone > actually ABX accurately between 24/96 and higher sample rates?
I have few HDAD albums by Classic Records with both 96/24 and 192/24 layers. If my comparison will convince the management to add support of new sampling rates, will do (how will I do that?) I just do not want to downsample anything. I have absolutely fabulous recording of Lindberg 2L in 192/24, why should I convert them? These recording were made in DXD (384KHz I think) And to the guys that do not (even) need 96/24, why did you buy Transporter? Good mastering of 96/24 has an edge over 44.1/24 and surely over 44.1/16 -- michael123 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76496 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
