DaveWr;694726 Wrote: > The issue is whether 44.1k or 96k or 192k make a tangible difference. > So far nobody seems to have reliably shown this.
Have you looked at the prices for flac downloads in standard redbook quality versus 24bit/88.2, 96, 176.4 & 192 kHz? There most definitely is a very tangible difference and someone is making lots of money based on this difference. Even more money when it turns out (as it sometimes does) that the high resolution files are simply upsampled redbook files. And there are people who say that audio myths are "harmless" :) -- ralphpnj Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -> Snatch -> The Transporter -> Transporter 2 (oops) -> Touch 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93990 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
