rgro;694891 Wrote: > This certainly may well be a reason to purchase an HD type recording but > at least we can now be clear that we're purchasing it for the mastering > skills of the engineers and not for any real advantage given by higher > sampling rates or bit depths. Imagine a HD version sounds indeed better because it was less compressed. The company will argue they can´t offer less compressed versions because the CD media is to limited but with 24/192 they can. This is nonsense and i hope more and more peole will get it!
I´d even go so far to call CD versions that obviously don´t sound as good as the HD release while they are from the same version as BROKEN and a valid reason to send them back. -- Wombat Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93990
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
