The conclusion so far is that john Swenson considers that digital
filters don't sound good unless they are on separate FPGAs -he doesn't
like the ones on the dac ships themselves (also IIRC some time ago he
said that the ones on the Sabre Dac are OK.)

AS I understand it conventional engineering thinking is that a well
designed DAC is not source dependent. Well designed does not mean
expensive.

Curiously the ones which might be source dependent are those designed
for/by audiophiles. At that point, I suggest that you draw your own
conclusions. 

[by way of a side turning i have been meaning for a while to see
whether I could test JS's hypothesis by implementing a sinc like
(linear phase, at least 80 db attenuation at nyquist) filter in Sox
which would mean that the half band filter in my MF DAC did very little
(there being no frequencies for it to attenuate- although I don;t
suppose i could really cut it off entirely without having -80db at
20kHz; but presumably a transition band 20-22kHz would mainly take it
out of the equation). I assume that filtering in Sox  should work at
least as well as the separate FPGA.

I have never got round to working out how to do this  though especially
given the upsampling to 96Khz which sox does at present courtesy of
phil's setting for inguz.]


-- 
adamdea
------------------------------------------------------------------------
adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94352

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to