touchup wrote: 
> > cfraser wrote: 
> > touchup: are you absolutely sure you're decoding the FLACs on your
> > server? If I don't, *then* I can hear a diff, but otherwise: nope,
> > sounds like the WAVs (which I also keep for everything). Edit: because
> > of course, the server is sending the *exact* same data to the SBT in
> > both cases when the FLACs are converted server side. FLACs are NOT
> > converted to WAV/PCM in real time, they are converted well before the
> > data is actually needed to be played.
> > 
> > I'm using a Bryston DAC/pre/amps->Maggies (wired ethernet, linear PS,
> > and very importantly the display *persistently* OFF, etc.). I can easily
> > hear the diffs between the settings etc. that people post. This is a
> > feature that I really like, because there's really nothing I can do to
> > significantly change the sound out of my disc transports (Sonic
> > Frontiers/Oppo), I get what they give into the same DAC.
> > 
> > 
> > Because they take up less drive space, I initially had a lot of CD's
> > ripped to FLACs, assuming they would sound the same as WAVs. FLAC files
> > were decoded on the server. But I forgot to convert a few WAVs to FLAC
> > prior to copying them to my network drive. That's how I found out that
> > WAVs at least to my ears sound so consistently better. I cannot explain
> > why. I know it shouldn't, but there it is.> > 
> 
> I really agree with the display off and have found that channel
> reversal by placing the back towards the speakers also sounds much
> better. At least turn off the display or the results are tragic.
> 
> zz


------------------------------------------------------------------------
pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to