ralphpnj wrote: > If I am reading the results correctly what we are taking about is jitter > (it is jitter which is being measured, correct?) that is at worst just > above 0.5 nanoseconds (SPDIF RCA 566 ps = 0.566 ns) and at just below > 0.002 nanoseconds (Toslink 1.462ps = 0.00146 ns). Which just proves what > I've been saying all along: JITTER at this level is inaudible by any > living person. > > The audiophile approach to jitter: > http://www.avguide.com/forums/jitter-audibility-robert-harley-and-keith-johnson-comment > > (Remember these gentlemen are really salesmen regardless of the other > job titles.) > > The reasonable, scientific approach to jitter: > http://davidkessner.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/a-pragmatic-approach-to-jitter-in-digital-audio/ > > (Remember this gentleman has nothing to sell.) > > Even with all the math and formulas the second article is easier to > understand and the author talks only about jitter and not early analog > tape recorders as first article does. In fact the first article is very > good example of FUD.
Maybe I read it wrong... I thought for example the "1.462 ps" was 1,462 ps (ie. 1.462 ns). For TosLink to have such low jitter of only 1.xx ps seems counter intuitive to me... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97950 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
