heisenberg wrote: 
> Some slight differences in the way the LPs were pressed, or handled, or
> packaged etc., contributed to the variation in the sound quality. I
> guess the technology was immature back in the day, coupled with shoddy
> quality assurance etc.
> 
> I wonder if the same consideration holds true for the modern pressings,
> or if the technology had advanced to the point where there is much more
> reliability in terms of the quality assurance?

The biggest variables in record pressing comes from two factors - where
in production run was a particular copy pressed and the purity of the
vinyl. 

The master disc is used to make multiple stampers which, in turn, are
used to press the records. Because the stamping process is physical, a
stamper may only produce perhaps 1,000 records before it is too worn and
has to be replaced. Think of a sharp knife which progressively dulls as
it is used until it needs to be resharpened. 

When you buy a record in a store, it is sheer blind luck as to whether
you get a LP that was stamped early during the production run with one
of the first stampers made from the master or whether you get a copy
from the end of the production of a stamper made toward the end of the
master's useful life. 

There is nothing about modern LP production plants that has fixed the
issue of progressive wear during the manufacturing cycle. (In fact, I
believe most LP factories use machines that were made 30 or more years
ago.) One only hopes the pressing plant cares enough about the quality
of their product to trade out stampers and masters often enough to keep
audible differences minimal between the start of a run and the end of
it.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
mlsstl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9598
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98603

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to