Wombat wrote: > No one really knows. The paper talks about a filter using a 500Hz > transition band realized with Matlab. People that know much more about > this stuff wanted to create own files but the paper does not include the > exact parameters you need. Matlab must have tons of possibilities > there. > It is a kind of joke that in a so called peer reviewed paper the data > for verifying the findings it is about are missing :) > They even used a bad dither method that no real-world resampler would > use today. > This may be also just another move to build a reason MQA does not need > all bits. >
Is this the paper where they used rectangular pdf dither not triangular despite the fact that Stuart knows fully well that rectangular PDF dither does not remove all the quantisation distortion? I thought that was simply outrageously intellectually bankrupt. Absolutely up there with staircase graphs to prove that hi rez is better. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103537 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
