drmatt wrote: > Imho it's not. Indeed. My question was somewhat rhetorical.
> At least it's done fully digitally so is theoretically not degradatious > (a new word, made by me. Like it?) compared to traditional analogue tone > controls. I guess "not degradatious" is the same as "transparent", but the latter has become a loaded word in audiophile circles... "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106335 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
