sfraser wrote: > You realize the increased BW and reduced crosstalk of the different CAT > cables can in no way be directly utilized by the music ? It simply > allows for a higher signalling rate which increases the error free > frames per second . The music is simply payload within the IP packet > that is contained within the ethernet frame. 10/100 Mbps Ethernet has a > data rate that is way more than capable of delivering PCM music. > Utilizing cables capable of error free 10G Ethernet in no way > improves "the sound" over error free 10M Ethernet. If your home network > is a 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet, the equipment cannot utilize the > increased "BW" of a ethernet cable capable of 10G ethernet rates. 2 > different cable types delivering the frames error free between two > hosts do not add or subtract anything from the IP payload, the music > content is delivered at exactly the same rate or mbps, regardless if it > is 10/100/1000M or 10G Ethernet and or Ethernet cables. > > If you like I can demonstrate this with lab results, I actually have a > LMS and squeezebox in our lab. No offence but benchmark and Bryson are know for their dry, sterile and hard sound. You'd never hear a difference with your gear.
Lab results are fine, but I have never been able to hear with my eyes, so reading results doesn't help much. But you can send your results to AQ et.al. maybe you can sue for false advertising. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106593 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
