marcb wrote: 
> No offense but you’re proving the old adage that a little knowledge can
> be dangerous.  99.9% of true stereo mixes (and even a great many mono
> mixes) are also not native and are exactly as you describe for
> multichannel mixes.  They originate from multi-track recordings ranging
> from 2 tracks to a nearly infinite # of tracks these days - and then
> they are mixed down to mono, stereo, quad, 4.1, 5.1, 7.1, etc.  This
> includes the vast, vast, vast majority of recordings made since the late
> 50s - including classical and live concert pop/jazz.
> 
> Very few multichannel mixes are fake multichannel from stereo or mono
> sources.  Period.  Even the RCA Living Stereo, Mercury Living Presence,
> Nat King Cole, etc 3.0 multichannel SACD’s are simply derived straight
> from the original 3 track recordings (which were the sources for the
> original stereo and mono mixes as well).  
> 
> Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but your opinion seems to be
> rooted in non-fact.Has it taken give years to think of a reply [emoji3]

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk




------------------------------------------------------------------------
slartibartfast's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35609
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102992

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to