Audit-l is sponsored by Audit Leverage by IAD Solutions, Inc.

***************************************

A great point to start your development for KPI's is what you have already
done - talk to upper management.  In addition, what reports are used by
management presently uses to track performance - these are wonderful reports
that audit can use as baselines to track.  Some institutions call these
quality control charts.

A frequent statement that I make to management when they ask for us to
define and institute a key performance indicator is:  What can I implement
(as an auditor) that you as a manager should not be using already?  Our
existence is not to replace the monitoring of management over their own area
but to expand the review to help note trends and flags that may be missed
when looking at these same reports from an operational standpoint.

A good example of an item we recently implemented:

File Maintenance and Address Changes - management should be producing a
report, reviewing it for suspicious activity, and performing sample tracing
of maintenance and address changes to source docs, and ensuring a letter is
sent to the clients previous address notifying of the change.  As an
auditor, we have applied thresholds to the process such as (1) # of address
changes on a particular account over a set period, (2) number of accounts
changed to a single address over that same period, (3) # of electronic
transactions or loan applications that have had an address change within X
period of days.  In these examples you can see that a report that should
already exist by management can be manipulated and compared against other
activities to produce flags for audit follow-up.

To further utilize the idea of KPI's, our audit enterprise-wide risk
assessment and scheduling activities reflect the # of occurrences of KPI
flags over the previous audit period.  We may believe an area is medium
risk, but the KPI's we rely on to track control areas may have produced an
excessive number of flags (meaning the control process is not functioning
efficiently or the thresholds are too stringent).  As auditors, we may need
to move up the scheduled audit.

Fraud is an topic of increasing importance in our profession, but the leap
to "responsibility" has not been formally made.  However, auditors (like it
or not) are expected to perform adequate testing or performance monitoring
to address the likelihood of fraud.  In fact, when fraud hits in an area
that audit has been - who gets the blank stare from management and the "why
didn't you find this" attitude.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Internal Audit key performance indicators


Audit-l is sponsored by Audit Leverage by IAD Solutions, Inc.

Audit Leverage is a department management software package that integrates
and automates the entire audit process.  This comprehensive package includes
risk assessment, audit planning, budgeting, staffing, scheduling,
timekeeping, automated work papers, audit findings & recommendations,
reporting and audit follow-up.  Audit Leverage allows auditors in the field
to work off-line and dial in to synchronize their work with the Audit
Leverage database on the network, enabling managers to review the work
papers instantly without being at the job site.

Demo available at www.auditleverage.com

***************************************


In my opinion, the audit department should not be judged by the number of
frauds uncovered.  While the audit department is responsible to be alert
for fraud, it is my understanding that looking for fraud is not the primary
focus.  In addition, while the audit department makes recommendations to
strengthen internal controls, it is management's decision whether to
implement those recommendations since they own the affected processes.
Thus, the number of frauds discovered could be included as a performance
measure in evaluating management, but I do not think it would be an
appropriate measure of performance for the audit department.  These
statements are just my opinion and I welcome other opinions.



 

                    Sharon Haapala

                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
                    Sent by:                    cc:

                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Subject:     Re: Internal
Audit key performance indicators                
                    ditnet.org

 

 

                    04/05/02 07:11 AM

 

 





At 01:45 PM 4/5/02 +0200, you wrote:
     My Boss who is the CEO would like me to come up with key performance
     indicators against which h would measure my performance.

     In my proposed indicators l have included such things as no
     of reports, recommendations implemented, budget performance, achieving
     set
     plan etc. This to him is not sufficient and he wants me to include
     such
     things as No. of frauds unravelled compared to previous years in
     dollars and
     quantity terms, reported against those determined by audit, etc. Can
     you
     suggest more indicators for me please.

I'd be very interested in hearing more ideas in this area.  Some of the
indicators mentioned above make me a bit nervous.  I'm a university
auditor, and some years I may not complete as many audits as other years,
simply due to the nature of the audits - how long they take, complicated
issues that might arise.  Similarly, I don't find fraud every year - we're
a small university that has excellent internal controls and audit trails.
If I had fewer audit reports issued and no frauds, would that mean I'm
doing poorly?

Just food for thought - please share any info you receive.
Sharon



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sharon J. Haapala, CIA, Auditor
Internal Audit Department
Michigan Technological University
906-487-1994
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~








If your organization would like to sponsor this discussion list send an
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for information.

To unsubscribe to the Audit-l list send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Leave the subject line blank and include the
following message in the body: 
Unsubscribe audit-l (yourname)

Thanks,
Jim Kaplan
List Manager

If your organization would like to sponsor this discussion list send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for information.

To unsubscribe to the Audit-l list send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Leave 
the subject line blank and include the following message in the body: 
Unsubscribe audit-l (yourname)

Thanks,
Jim Kaplan
List Manager

Reply via email to