-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Russell Harmon wrote: > I was just wondering, has anyone tried to get aufs included in the > kernel? If not, why not? I've got nothing against AUFS (I use it myself, and I'm quite content with it), but I think it'll have to mature a bit before it would be accepted into the 2.6-tree. I've had almost no serious issues - a couple of kernel panics, but mr. Okajima is very quick to put out fixes. :-)
I hope mr. Okajima will keep up the good work, and we'll probably see aufs in 2.6 soon :-) OTOH, I guess you could try getting it added with an EXPERIMENTAL tag or something. But aufs still has very rapid development cycles, so the code in the kernel release would get "outdated" very soon. :-) Kindest regards, Jørgen P. Tjernø. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGnjj7wqQbW3my7pcRAoXgAJkBvQ0KUpsF1P+n0awIkqxhloaLiwCeO3xm tu8A3K3/Gc98Nzv8NSL3DOU= =+VGE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
