On Sep 13 2007 10:02, Tomas M wrote: > >I can see in aufs code that the only difference is that if MAX_127 is >used, aufs_bindex_t is type 'signed char', while in other cases (for >MAX_511, MAX_1023 and MAX_32767) aufs_bindex_t is type 'short'.
Think array. char foo[127] is smaller than int foo[127] is smaller than short foo[32767]. No aufs expert here, but that is what I would assume. Jan -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/