On Sep 13 2007 10:02, Tomas M wrote:
>
>I can see in aufs code that the only difference is that if MAX_127 is 
>used, aufs_bindex_t is type 'signed char', while in other cases (for 
>MAX_511, MAX_1023 and MAX_32767) aufs_bindex_t is type 'short'.

Think array. char foo[127] is smaller than int foo[127] is smaller
than short foo[32767].

No aufs expert here, but that is what I would assume.



        Jan
-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Reply via email to