"Tomas M":
> In fact, I don't really need it that much. 1024 is enough for me today.
> But every limit is bad, in general... and moreover if the limit is only
> caused by the used function to allocate memory (kmalloc here), then there
> must be a way to rewrite it better :)

Then I postpone this issue again.
Generally speaking, in order to get better performance for both of time
and space, I will keep using kmalloc.


Junjiro Okajima

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Reply via email to