Am Sonntag, den 05.04.2009, 08:19 -0500 schrieb Chris Brannon: > Stefan Husmann wrote: > > the voting period for Defcon has ended, and he did not get the majority > > of votes. He got four times "yes", eleven times "no" and four abstains. > > So, that is democracy, but it would be nice if there would be some > > discussion about the reasons for the failure. > > I looked at Defcon's PKGBUILDs. Here's a (hopefully constructive) suggestion. > > When applying, point out the work that *you* have done. > Mention those packages that you contributed, I.E., those > that aren't adopted.
Packages that are not adopted? Well, to find a package that is interesting is not easy, the more so as in AUR are already a lot of packages. So i adopt it, because it is important that the orphaned packages are evolved, i think. It's no use that in AUR are many many packages, and more of them are orphaned. > If you put some serious effort into an adopted package, > mention that as well. > What have you done that makes you proud? Tell us about it. Proud? What has that got to do with the price of fish? Arch Linux is a wondeful distro, and i like it to build packages. Ok, some PKGBUILDs here and there needs improvement, but there is nothing that can't be learn. Cheers > > -- Chris -- Jens Maucher <jensmauc...@online.de> Gnupg: 44FF54EA Fingerprint: 0E54 F345 E7C9 0295 90F8 2B56 CD9A EE71 44FF 54EA
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil