> I think you wrong to begin the vote procedure without a discussion > period. Ok, we had that, but no one TU posted nothing about and this > should warn you.
I tried to contact with some TUs who took me constructive critics in the first application, and they gave me positive feedbacks by now (but maybe they will answer too). I think a silent discussion period in this case could give chances to hope in a successful voting period instead of warning us (me and Sergej), because if there was any problem with someone in the past that was explained in the discussion period to clarify it, because that's why discussion period exists :) Some TUs reassured me meanwhile, so I really hoped because I love Archlinux :P > Though I voted 'abstain' I am sorry for Laszlo, but seems that Arch is > not his way. After the 'big fails' (the first application) he did a > bad impression and bad impressions are hard to clean. You're right Andrea, I did some mistakes when I entered the archlinux community, and I've felt its effect, but recently I think the situation has changed, I experienced it from the feedbacks. (or at least I tried to change it :P). 'bad impressions are hard to clean' -> I imagined when I was child and a really bad boy huhh, I caused so much problems for my parents, I feel sorry them :), but we love each other since then, and I think the forgiveness is good human feature if the person can do it. I guess Sergej's purpose (and me too) was with this discussion for me to know where you, TUs see my weeknesses so that I will be able to improve it. Anyway, thanks everything and for everybody who voted anyway, mainly for Sergej whose time I exploited :) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp