On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Laszlo Papp <djsz...@archlinux.us> wrote: > but I will show some mails from Xavier too: > > I saw this patch in frugalware, vmiklos applied it, and I thought it > will be useful for archers too, and just see the answer from Xavier, > he called me 'for something', but with it he called 'vmiklos' too > explicite, who started the arch pacman development much more earlier > than Xavier, so it's fair :( > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-November/010185.html > > Another situation: > I helped Eric with my answer, Eric figured out the problem, but Xavier > started to offense me somehow without any neccessarity because Eric > and me were happy with finding the solution for his problem: > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-November/010014.html >
After 6 months of trying to work with you, I gave up. These two mails you quoted are clearly over-reaction. I did have some problems with the mails/patches you sent, but you did much worse than that before. These 2 mails *alone* (and without considering the huge amount of previous crap you did or sent) would not deserve such answers. But in a complete despair, I hoped I could offend you enough to make you leave :) It might have even worked. Anyway, I have nothing to do with the TU vote. So this discussion ends here as far as I am concerned. You always want to have the last word ? Here, take it !