On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbranno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Thomas Bächler wrote: >> >> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >> >> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". >> > >> > This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. >> >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). > > I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be > it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished > later. >
Lol no punishment! I don't wanna hit anybody!; Well, other question how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu ? how will be called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all? there are many many questions until we can make this idea possible. Just that. > -- > Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net> > GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 > Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net > OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 > IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC > -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
