On 02/03/2010 07:48 PM, Lex Rivera wrote: > The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own > repo, maybe > that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of > orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, > since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i > think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. > Sorry for my bad english =( > > On 03/02/10 12:31, Angel Velásquez wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbranno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thomas Bächler wrote: >>>> I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position >>>> instead of calling it "Semi-TU". >>> >>> This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it. >> >> Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be >> creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, >> if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that >> part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start >> writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if >> it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). >> >> Let's see what happens! >> >> >> >> -- >> Angel Velásquez >> angvp @ irc.freenode.net >> Arch Linux Trusted User >> Linux Counter: #359909 >> http://www.angvp.com
Let's start the cleaning here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&do_Orphans=Orphans&detail=0&C=0&SeB=nd&SB=v&SO=a&PP=25&outdated=on Maybe we should just delete all packages with no votes and that have been orphaned. -- Ape <Lauri Niskanen>