On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:48:34PM +0100, Lex Rivera wrote: > The main reason why a asked for it is amount of crap in AUR. I have my own > repo, maybe > that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of > orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, > since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i > think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. > Sorry for my bad english =( >
In my opinion, the requested changes for AUR reported here are done very
quickly,
isn't it? And no special rights for AUR are needed to check the
submitted packages. I see a lot of complexity, but I'm not sure for what added
values.
What should be the tasks for the AUR moderators? I can think of:
- check submitted/changed PKGBUILDs (no special rights needed)
- orphan/remove packages (IMO done quickly by TU's)
- manage AUR accounts (same as above ...)
- ?
Cheers,
Jaroslav
--
Das beste Mittel gegen Zorn ist Abstand
-- Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4-65 n.Chr.)
pgp293pWSVdYO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
