Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2010-11-26 12:31:57 +0100: > On 26 November 2010 18:23, Peter Lewis <ple...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > > On Friday 26 November 2010 08:44:56 Philipp Überbacher wrote: > >> Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100: > >> > On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote: > >> > > fftw2double > >> > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936 > >> > > > >> > > Same as fftw2 at community. > >> > > >> > The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does > >> > that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a > >> > separate pacakge? > >> > > >> > Pete. > >> > >> fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound > >> maintainers should adapt their packages though. > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594 > > > > Well fftw-threads is version 3 and it seems that even the latest version of > > rezound still depends on version 2.x (they explicitly say not version 3 > > yet). > > The question is whether or not it can run with fftw2 from [community] or > > not. > > Confirmed. fftw2double needs to stay. It doesn't conflict with fftw2 > anyway (different library name), and rezound depends on it > exclusively. Rezound does not build against fftw2 or fftw(-threads).
Sorry, I missed the 2/3
