Am 03.12.2010 22:54, schrieb David Campbell: > Excerpts from keenerd's message of 2010-12-03 13:46:10 -0500: >> If no one can think of a better way to deal with the nonconforming >> packages, I'll write a bot to post insulting comments. Personally, I >> really like this solution. The AUR has always had a wild west >> frontier / insane asylum feel to it. The less regulation, the better >> it works. But a few well placed suggestions could help make the two >> thousand maintainers do a better job. > > Isn't this the sort of thing namcap was designed for? Maybe > namcap should be extended to do checks on .src packages, and a > report could be posted automatically using namcap when someone > posts a .src package to the AUR. > -- > David Campbell > No, namcap is a tool for providing clean packages, not for clean aur-tarballs.
But again, if the "uncleanlyness" of the aur tarballs in discussion here only consists in the fact that they provide icon files, they are IMHO not even unclean. Regards Stefan