On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:58:50 -0500 keenerd <keen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Loui Chang <louipc....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The problem is that namcap's implementation is not meant for > > untrusted PKGBUILDs. Sourcing those build files is a big security > > flaw, so we can't do that for the AUR. > > Thankfully, what I'm doing here does not even look at the pkgbuild. > It just looks at the directory structure, runs "file" on everything > and compares this to a (tediously compiled) whitelist. Nothing fancy. > Would make a lot of sense to have it built in. > > -Kyle > http://kmkeen.com
Hm dunno how your Bot works but is there a way to read the size from a png file for it and say everything larger than x*y pixels shall be removed? If not there's still the way to say everything > x KB shall be removed. The rules need to be modified to this anyway, however as Heiko already said, not every upstream tarball provides the icon necessary for a desktop file and there are plenty of apps which need one for DE users. Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
