On Mon 06 Dec 2010 10:59 +0100, Nicky726 wrote: > been told by the bot, that selinux-flex has a binary (selinux-flex/flex- > arch.patch.gz), which is a gziped patch. Guess I can ungzip it, though as > this > package is just a copy of a [core] package from some time ago, I guess the > original maintainers new, what they were doing, if they included it this way. > So should I do it to not include evil gziped patches?
It would be best to avoid. It would be preferable to have the patch incorporated upstream if possible.
