On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:56:12 +0100 Xyne <x...@archlinux.ca> wrote: > Thorsten Töpper wrote: > > > > Still because of that quickshot I'll change my previous expectation > > to vote. > > > > Even a reassurance won't change that for this vote, probably for a > > future one but not for this. > > > > Sorry but once a application is passed the applicant has directly to > > show a responsible behaviour, TU stands for Trusted User not > > Trolling User. > > This is not meant as a direct insult, don't misinterprete it. > > Regardless of how it was meant, "Trolling User" was inappropriate > imo. The intentions were good. It's the rashness that's the problem > as far as I'm concerned. Realizing that it was a bad idea and that > there are better ways to do things is enough.
You're right, that was far too harsh, pardon me for this formulation. @Kyle: Starting a discussion about the tarballs was a good idea, what followed was wrong, so I'm stuck between an Abstain and a No and I guess some other TUs are also thinking about how they should handle this. The discussion is nearly finished, still a statement from your side might help to decide, which of these two options seems right, even after the end of this phase. -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature