On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:44:19 +0000 Peter Lewis <ple...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 December 2010 20:53:40 Kaiting Chen wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Thorsten Töpper > <atsut...@freethoughts.de>wrote: > > > ... I'm stuck between an Abstain and a No and I guess some other > > > TUs are also thinking about how they should handle this... > > > > You can stop being stuck; with the current bylaws Abstain and No are > > functionally identical. > > Just out of interest - has a circumstance occured as yet where a > difference in understanding of the concept of "abstain" would have > affected the outcome? If so, what happened?
Well as Kaiting said in the amendment thread, he thinks as a machine, so with this binary thinking I'll just ignore this everywhere where it's not topic of the thread, in other words for the current state: everywhere except for the amendment one. -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
