On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:49, Nicky726 <nicky...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dne pondělí 07 února 2011 10:35:19 jste napsal(a): >> On 02/07/11 04:06, Nicky726 wrote: >> > Angel Velasquez wrote: >> >> Why you didn't reply on the thread ? :S now this thread is splitted >> >> without reason >> > >> > Sorry, Re: somehow slipped out from Subject line. :-( >> > Nicky >> >> Actually, I think your e-mail client is misconfigured/broken somehow; >> let's debug. It looks like none of the messages you've sent on the Arch >> lists have stayed on-thread. Looking in the headers, the message you >> are replying to here says >> >> Message-ID: <aanlktikxeehdop7gaqzeenwmsxhkz0fwybhmxw1c6...@mail.gmail.com> >> >> and your header does not match this value in In-Reply-To (as successful >> replies do), and rather says >> >> In-Reply-To: <mailman.3068.1297052058.26845.aur-gene...@archlinux.org> >> . >> >> (Which indicates your client does think it is sending a reply of some >> sort, not just a new message.) >> >> Your User-Agent claims to be User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 >> (Linux/2.6.37-ARCH; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ), and this appears to have >> happened for you on the Arch list with your earlier versions of KMail >> too. I I don't remember seeing this particular issue before; any idea >> (Nicky or anyone) what's wrong? >> >> -Isaac > > Could that be that I get Arch's mailing lists as diggests and reply to them in > the client and copy the subject of the particular message. Am I supposed to do > it in a different way? (Possibly with keeping the messages delivered in a > digest, not every separetely). > Now as this is a reply to a directly delivered message, it should fit > correctly. I didn't touch the subject field in this case at all. > Btw, thax you're trying to debug my issues.
I don't usually subscribe in digest-mode, but I vaguely recall that there's a setting to get the digest in the form where each message is a MIME attachment to the digest message (if that makes sense). When I did that then my MUA, mutt, could open each attachment as an email and I could reply from that view, which resulted in the correct In-Reply-To and In-Relation-To values. I'm not a user of KMail myself so you'll have to experiment with it to see if it behaves the same way as mutt ;-) /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus