Dne Po 7. února 2011 16:31:22 Ng Oon-Ee napsal(a): > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:03 +0000, Magnus Therning wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:49, Nicky726 <nicky...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Could that be that I get Arch's mailing lists as diggests and reply to > > > them in the client and copy the subject of the particular message. Am > > > I supposed to do it in a different way? (Possibly with keeping the > > > messages delivered in a digest, not every separetely). > > > Now as this is a reply to a directly delivered message, it should fit > > > correctly. I didn't touch the subject field in this case at all. > > > Btw, thax you're trying to debug my issues. > > > > I don't usually subscribe in digest-mode, but I vaguely recall that > > there's a setting to get the digest in the form where each message is > > a MIME attachment to the digest message (if that makes sense). When I > > did that then my MUA, mutt, could open each attachment as an email and > > I could reply from that view, which resulted in the correct > > In-Reply-To and In-Relation-To values. I'm not a user of KMail myself > > so you'll have to experiment with it to see if it behaves the same way > > as mutt ;-) > > > > /M > > On other MLs I'm on the general perception is that if you plan to reply, > please don't use digests. In other words, digest subscriptions should be > considered 'read-only', precisely because of the thread-breaking > behaviour. > > Magnus' solution sounds nifty though, if you can get it working.
Lets see now, if I got it working, KMail displays encapsulated messages and now I replied directly to yours. -- Don't it always seem to go That you don't know what you've got Till it's gone (Joni Mitchell)
