On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:55:57 +0200 Philipp Überbacher <hollun...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of > trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and custom rules for every page) > for what could be achieved by simply defaulting to https? I don't really understand why it's so important to break existing links by forcing everyone onto the https page. What happens if you *don't want to use https*? Why are the Arch webby bods forcing this nanny-state twatmuppetry down our throats? -- Gordon JC Pearce MM0YEQ <gordon...@gjcp.net>
