On 26/03/13 (Tue) 19:38, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I adopted ruby-jist [1] not so long ago, but I'd like to ask for its > > deletion now, in order to conform better to the package naming > > guidelines for Ruby gems [2]. I've submitted a new package called > > simply > > "jist" [3]. I don't think merging is necessary in this case. > > > > Regards. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-jist/ > > [2] > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines#Package_Naming > > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jist/ > > > > Merged, thx :) >
Thank you. Following the same principle, could it be possible to merge ruby-rhc [1] into rhc [2], please? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rhc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rhc/
pgpf5EnuP_zNe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
