---------------------------------------- > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:27:12 -0400 > From: li...@eyanulis.net > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal request > > On 4/4/2013 16:09, 小龙 陈 wrote: > > ---------------------------------------- > >> From: aluc...@gmail.com > >> To: aur-general@archlinux.org > >> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:52:15 +0200 > >> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal request > >> > >> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:42 +0200, Gavin Costello wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Please remove the package cisco-vpnclient, as this product has reached > >>> end-of-life: > >>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5743/ps5699/ps2308/end_of_life_c51-680819.html > >>> > >>> Also, openconnect in extra provides the same functionality. > >>> > >>> Thanks and regards, > >>> > >>> Gavin. > >> A package still depends on it, I posted on its page and will wait until > >> I get answer, if I get one, before deleting both. > >> > >> Cheers. > >> -- > >> Maxime > >> > > I'd like to point out that openconnect can only replace cisco-vpnclient > > if the server is updated to support it. There are still many companies > > using very old software which is only compatible with the shrew soft > > VPN client (ike) and the old cisco-vpnclient. > > > > Cheers, > > Xiao-Long > VPNC (in [extra]) should be compatible with (most of) those Cisco VPN > setups which are unsupported by openconnect. Do configurations still > exist in which neither will work? > > Eric Yanulis
I'm not entirely sure. VPNC never worked with my dad's company's VPN. To be honest though, I didn't try very many times. They ban IP addresses after 3 failed connection attempts. Cheers, Xiao-Long
