On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN <aluc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Marcel Korpel <marcel.li...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Maxime GAUDUIN <aluc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I mostly agree with you, but I would still keep the git package because >> I, >> > and I believe most people, don't want to pull 2Gb from the mercurial repo >> > and keep them lying around. This is painfully slow and, even though 2Gb >> are >> > nothing today, it is silly to waste space like this. The git repo >> contains >> > only the relevant TTF files and I think it is the better choice for whom >> > wants to download the Google web fonts. >> > >> > How do others feel about this? >> >> I totally agree with this. >> >> Regards, >> Marcel >> > > Okay, the only remaining webfonts packages in AUR are now > ttf-google-webfonts-git and ttf-google-webfonts-hg. > > Cheers. > -- > Maxime
Thank you. For those curious, I compared the disk usage of both the -git and -hg packages on my system. ttf-google-webfonts-git uses 459 MiB. ttf-google-webfonts-hg uses 2.6 GiB. To make things less ambiguous, I am going to alter the pkgdesc for my package to clarify why we have both a -git and -hg version. I CC'd the maintainer of the -git version. Jason