On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:20:43AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > On 27 November 2013 04:43, Lieven Moors <lievenmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think technically, ntk-git should provide > > ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release > > of ntk. > > You can depend on ntk-git, but a better approach is to have ntk-git > provide ntk, and depend on that -- if devel functionality of ntk is > not required by non-daw-git. So just nudge the ntk-git maintainer.
With devel functionality, do you mean header files? Wouldn't they be needed to build non-daw-git anyway? The problem is that ntk-git has been in a state of constant flux, and non-daw-git would often refuse to build, unless you rebuild ntk-git first...
