On 12 January 2014 23:42, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Karol Blazewicz > <karol.blazew...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkov...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman <sc...@archlinux.org> >>> wrote: >>>> Since there was no 'rstudio' at the time that user uploaded this one, >>>> there is no infringement of any rule or guideline per se. Just tell >>>> them to upload an 'r-studio' to mitigate the confusion that resulted >>>> from it. I don't think there is any need to merge unless there were >>>> relevant comments. It is up to the maintainer to update the PKGBUILD >>>> with the suggested changes. >>> >>> The question is whether the maintainer is still active at all. Hist >>> last action is 2012-08-27 and he has only two packages, both over the >>> year old with one being flagged out of date since February. >>> >>> Lukas >> >> e-mail sent. >> If he doesn't respond in two weeks, maybe a TU can reupload and disown >> it, or remove it from the AUR altogether, whichever is deemed the >> correct action. > > The maintainer has taken no action and didn't respond to my e-mail.
Did your e-mail actually get through to that address? It's being returned here, and if we'd known this before we could've just gone ahead and done what we wanted. An non-existent e-mail address is close to meaning a non-existent user. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
