On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Jeremy Audet <ichimonj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package name > proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue stating that > it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns. > > Excellent point. The principle of least surprise would dictate that > packages have obvious names light lightworks or powerdns.
Status? There still are two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks
