On 2014-09-04 14:07, lolilolicon wrote: > > How about tags=(awesome cool game)? </sarcasm>
Well, my goal is to sometime be able to search installed packages quickly. I have installed some games of which I can't recall their names, and there's really no quick way to search for them in pacman - that was my main motivation for more metadata, especially since we already have categories. On 2014-09-04 16:57, Jeremy Audet wrote: > What happens if something really belongs in two categories? In that case, > one should use a tagging mechanism instead of a categorization mechanism. > Agreed. Like minecraft-server, which is a game and a daemon, just to name one. As-is, I don't think categories add much value or are worth keeping, if they can be parsed by pacman somehow, they would add some use. Otherwise, I'm ok with deleting them. > > On the other hand, I think we should remove category because only a > > few packages actually use correct category. It is almost useless. > > +1 > > — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet Cheers, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
pgpdGy4cxPND5.pgp
Description: PGP signature