On 09/18/2017 02:59 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 02:01:18PM +0000, NicoHood wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 12:06 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: >>> Em setembro 17, 2017 5:57 Jelle van der Waa escreveu: >>>> >>>> I sincerely don't believe that this will have the right affect, it will >>>> be treated as spam. >>>> >>>> Maybe we should start advocating to use extra-$arch-build for building >>>> AUR packages, since that contains base-devel :-). This is probably also >>>> what Debian does I guess or does every package implictly depend on >>>> 'build-essential'. >>>> >>> >>> +1 for using devtools and extra-x86_64-build for AUR packages too. I have >>> been doing that for a while now, and it does catch a lot of issues. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Giancarlo Razzolini >> >> I also agree on that. Building in a clean chroot has multiple advantages: >> * Mostly equal builds for everybody (until they are reproducible) >> * Less errors, as only, but all makedepends must be installed in the chroot >> * Less trashed archlinux installations because of makedependency >> installation >> * Devtools is even simpler to handle if you ask me >> >> I also do not understand why AUR helpers dont use devtools. It would >> give much better package quality. >> > Mine does... </shameless_plug>
So does yaourt, simply append MAKEPKG="extra-i686-build -- " to /etc/yaourtrc and it will use that as the makepkg command for building packages. pacaur, however, does not support custom makepkg/pacman commands. :( It's probably useless bloat and feature-creep or something. -- Eli Schwartz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
