On 2/27/19 1:37 AM, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 2019-02-27 02:09, alad via aur-general wrote: >> Considering some recent issues regarding team behavior [1] in Arch, I'm >> going to have to ask on some of your previous interactions with the >> community, and open-source in general. I had two examples in particular, >> the MineTest community [2], and interaction with other Arch users on >> ArchWiki [3]. >> >> [1] >> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-October/034461.html >> >> [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18156980 >> [3] >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=XDG_Base_Directory&diff=prev&oldid=391411 >> >> >> By definition, a TU has to interact with users of community packages >> (bug reports, emails, coordination with the rest of the Arch team, ...), >> and users of the AUR in general (AUR requests, peace-keeping, >> interactions with previous maintainers when promoting packages, ...). >> This means that if aggressive behavior such as the above is part of some >> general theme, there is a clear problematic. >> >> Note that this is _not_ meant as a witch-hunt of any sort - nor do I >> have any kind of personal involvement here. I do however value healthy >> communication in the Arch community, and believe any TU candidate should >> value it as well. > > > I would also chip in with the following from early 2017: > > https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/1227 > > > (I am also not in any sort of witch hunt, just thought this would be > relevant.)
If the only thing we can find to complain about is his attitude towards Manjaro, then we obviously cannot find anything to complain about. :) -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature