On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 11:04:07, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Would it be good enough for you if I renamed it from "aur" to > "aur-client"? So at least it won't sound like the AUR itself?
We currently only block aur and aurweb. There is some gray area but I'd
suggest to use another name that does not belong to the set
aur{,web}{,-cli,-client}. These are all names we would potentially use
for an official client and might decide to delete anytime.
