On Sun 16 Jul 2023 at 15:37, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > I have experience with packaging (debian, for work) but not on arch, but > it’s shell and that thing I can handle :)
Why not show this by maintaining some AUR packages? > This is not gpg signed and I’m sorry for that, but gian and Antonio can > also vouch for me as the validity of this email. Why is it not signed? I think you should read https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Trusted_Users and re-submit a signed application showing the minimum requirements are met. -- Jonathan Steel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
