On 12/18/23 11:58, myself...@tutanota.de wrote:
I would like to appeal against PRQ#52152, which claims that the
uploaded package is a duplicate. The package uses Debian's Linux
kernel as source which (as was communicated to the TU and also stated
on the package page) moves non-free (non-DFSG compliant) parts to
separate packages*, making it a drop-in replacement for Arch's kernel
for people who want to use a 100% free kernel, while also retaining
the ability to load those parts individually.
*
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-kernel-handbook/ch-source.html#s-changes
--
Odoslané pomocou Tutanoty. Užívaj si bezpečné e-maily bez reklám.
Wouldn't a name like linux-dfsg or linux-dfsg-compliant be much better
than linux-bin for this use case? The name linux-bin implies that it is
a duplicate of the linux package in core...
