21 Dec 2023, 03:49 by myself...@tutanota.de: > Here's the summary: > > I uploaded a package that soon got flagged for deletion. There were > multiple reasons stated in the email which got soon accepted afterwards. > I was able to find an email address of the TU and sent him a response to > the claims and even tho they were not valid, namely that ARM only > packages break the rules of the submission guidelines, and that the > package is of low quality due to using curl to fetch pkgver and > checksums, I tried to comply in ways that would eventually make the > package better. I explained that the way AUR handles package updates is > not optimal and that I prefer automated updates over pushing repetitive > git commits. > > After some time have passed I reuploaded a modified PKGBUILD that added > x86 support, after which it was removed again with the reason "Dupe of > [base] linux package". Even tho the pkgurl field has shown it's the > Debian kernel, I've seen this wasn't communicated properly on my behalf > so informed the TU that I'll make a note about the difference in the > package comments section. I pushed a package update after some days and > added the said note and this led to my account being suspended. From my > point of view, I'm being attacked for my effort to resolve issues, but > the expectation is to follow orders rather than obey rules, which is > abusive and also shameful. I have not broken any of the rules despite > being accused of doing so. Meanwhile, only a single person has shown > willingness to help. > > After reading posts of people facing the same or a similar situation, I > was thinking why the Arch community treats its userbase in such a > condescending way and came up with the idea that perhaps it's because > "Arch Linux" is more of a hobby project than it is a commercial > distribution, so there is a sense of ownership and consequently shared > decisions of what "I" want or not to be in it, and therefore no > incentive to keep the users happy. Despite of that, there are better > ways to achieve your goals without the need to be offensive to other > people I think. > I guess that you didn't read Packaging Guidelines and Submission Guidelines in ArchWiki __Properly__, before submitting your package to AUR.
Arch is a community based GNU/Linux distro, in the frame of its rules and guidelines. Every system has a Frame, defined by its conducts, rules and guidelines. Any system has to have a it, it's unavoidable. And in Arch Linux, they have just some easygoing rules which I found not any hard to follow. These rules and guidelines are up for benefit of all of us. So, this community has a pretty lose frame that can include most types of orientations. And Compared to other Distros, it takes much less effort contributing back into it. But if you don't want or can't follow its simple rules, You always can keep everything local and stay a user, not a contributor. I am personally maintaining some PKGBUILDs in my local repo. For the case of your PKGBUILD, why you didn't try to send it to mailing list and/or Arch forum before uploading into AUR, as is advised by ArchWiki? -- Best Regards, Abraham Sent with Tutanota; https://tuta.com
