On Mon Aug 10, 2026 at 7:55 PM CEST, Borna Punda wrote:
> +1 from a security professional.
>
>
>
-1 from another security professional because socket.dev seems to be a
slopware company. (Or at least to be very enthusiastic about LLMs which
is more or less the same)
There are most likely many better ways to spend money to handle the spam
waves.
- Exploring Socket security scanning for the AUR Maria
- Exploring Socket security scanning for the AU... Maria
- Re: Exploring Socket security scanning fo... Borna Punda
- Re: Exploring Socket security scannin... Nicolai Dagestad
- Re: Exploring Socket security scannin... mpan
- Re: Exploring Socket security scannin... Cynthia Rey
- Re: Exploring Socket security sca... Borna Punda
- Re: [Possible phishing attem... archlinux . endeared273
- Re: [Possible phishing a... Borna Punda
- Re: Exploring Socket security sca... Maarten de Vries
- Re: Exploring Socket securit... Jonathan Rayne
- Re: Exploring Socket sec... Emiliano Gandini
- Re: Exploring Socket... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: Exploring Socket... Cynthia Rey
